A BLOG of PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS & SPECULATIONS

A New Kind of Ignorance

Published on Monday February 9th, 2009

One of the most overlooked opportunities for insight is overhearing strangers’ conversations. I remember once sitting in a restaurant with friends engaged in intense conversation about something philosophical, political or maybe cultural - I don’t quite remember what it was exactly, but as we left, I noticed that the debate became viral and lit up other corners of the restaurant, and I was struck with a pleasant sense of shared interest with other humans - that these questions grip us and enliven us as a species; they aren’t merely “inner realities” of solitary individuals persuing our private path”, but shared realities with consequences that spread through the social space.

Today I sat at a playground while my daughter climbed and swung, and I sat and listened, overhearing a conversation between a girl, maybe 7 years old, her father and her mother.

Daughter: I want to go on the playground!

Father: This playground is for little kids, you are too big.

Daughter, upset: Why?

Father: That’s just the way it goes. That’s life, you grew up. Look at us, we don’t get to play there either.

Mother: But you get to do all kinds of other things, like going to fancy parties and dressing up in pretty dresses!

In dealing with the ups and downs of life, the Father teaches us a single principle, “Face the truth!” The Mother, another principle, “Heal your hurts with positive thoughts!” Who is right? Framed as an either/or choice, we can follow each principle to a pathological point, so looking at it that way, both are wrong! What’s left for us to put into practice is an uneasy detente between opposing points of view, a clumsy feeling of fragmentation and self-doubt. “Am I blinding myself to the truth to comfort myself? Or am I negating my emotions to force myself to face the truth?” Isn’t this the pattern of many of our problems? We are awash in strategies, techniques, ideas, values and principles to apply, but we can’t synthesize them effectively.

As our knowledge increases, we’ve effectively created a new kind of ignorance. We know how to evaluate the pros and cons of either/or choice, but we are astoundingly stupid about the logic of both/and; our language is imprecise, our methods are ad hoc, unsystematic and unteachable. The best we (or our parents) can do is offer the many possibilities and hope that the result is something useful and coherent.

Colloqium

Further Reflections

June 2nd, 2013

Racism, Stalinism & Politeness

Caution: 3,337 words ahead The premise of this post has some immediate, flagrant problems, so it would probably be better to just start off with that. Here's the premise: anti-racism is becoming like Stalinism. The obvious (and wrong) interpretation would be that I'm saying that the efforts of anti-racist activists have…

Read more →
May 15th, 2013

Critique of User Interface Illusions

Alexis Madrigal spent some time with Facebook's UX designers and content strategists and wrote a profile and a critique of what he takes to be the company's design philosophy. There's a lot to like about this essay in terms of its focus and the questions it raises, but one flaw is…

Read more →
April 3rd, 2013

Compassionate Violence in Buddhism

Caution: 3,000 words ahead Many writers have argued that we live in an era of unprecedented narcissism, particularly when we're talking about Millenials—the most notable example is of course Jean Twenge. To me it's self-evidently true, but many disagree and write aggrieved and slightly pathetic articles contesting these points and praising…

Read more →