A BLOG of PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS & SPECULATIONS

How sex-positive is anti-sex

Published on Thursday July 16th, 2009

This was a comment I made in response to a blog post about a new sex-positive social networking site called Blackbox Republic:

I think you are right about the extremes. On one side, the traditional viewpoint thinks you should be ashamed for enjoying yourself. On the other, the sex-positive folks who think you should be ashamed for not enjoying yourself. The former is on the decline and the latter is increasingly common, but in order to frame the sex-positive folks as radical forward-thinkers, it’s necessary to exaggerate the “bad” traditional viewpoint.

Not only do we have to enjoy sex, we have to do so in public. Keeping those things private out of modesty is perceived as shamefully uptight and inhibited, which is why Blackbox Republic starts you off with little sharing, but a quick glance at the website indicates the point of view: ultimately, you have a moral obligation to express your sexuality in public, but they tolerantly and nonjudgmentally accept that it’s a gradual process for some.

But isn’t it clear that Paul Begala, the stereotypically repressed Catholic, is expressing the truly sex-positive viewpoint? What if sex is only enjoyable and exciting because it happens in secret, behind closed doors, behind the back of the big authority? The guilty pleasure is the only true pleasure. In this sense, Catholic monogamy is the ideal: everyone knows that a married couple is doing it, but it’s still kept secret. We all interact together as if we don’t know. And the best way to prevent teenagers from having sex is for the parents’ to share openly all the intimate, disgusting details of their sex life.

Once the authority is defeated and sex comes out of the closet and into the open, it becomes boring, routine, reduced to mere moving body parts. They want to make sex like any other natural activity, like sleeping or eating or walking? Those are the most boring parts of life! Maybe they want to take it even further and make it like shitting: no pleasure, just bad smells, bodily functions and a mess to clean up afterwards.

Colloqium

Readers of this post have also read

April 12th, 2011

The Actuality of Ayn Rand

Slavoj Zizek in The Actuality of Ayn Rand: From my high school days, I remember the strange gesture of a good friend of mine that shocked me considerably at the time. The teacher asked us to write an essay on "what satisfaction does it provide to accomplish a good deed of helping one's neighbor"—the idea being that each of us should…

Read more →
October 1st, 2010

Have you ever been in love?

Neil Gaiman in The Sandman: Have you ever been in love? Horrible isn't it? It makes you so vulnerable. It opens your chest and it opens up your heart and it means that someone can get inside you and mess you up. You build up all these defenses, you build u a whole suit of armor, so that nothing can hurt…

Read more →
February 12th, 2011

My Wound Existed Before Me

My wound existed before me. I was born to embody it. — Joe Bousquet…

Read more →

Recent Popular Posts

February 13th, 2014

Left Activism Goes Corporate

One of the most tedious features of the Silicon Valley Hype Machine is its endless repetition of progressive sounding marketing slogans about democracy and freedom, all while promoting a pro-business agenda. But it's too easy to read this as a sinister corporate ploy to co-opt the language of activists and twisting…

Read more →
December 20th, 2013

Civility: A Distance That
Brings Us Together

Just in time for the holidays, Apple's marketing department released Misunderstood, an ad about a surly teenager absorbed in his iPhone in the midst of scenes of his family's idyllic Christmas togetherness. But he surprises everyone when he reveals that the whole time he was making a touching video for everyone to document their familial bliss, moving them to tears. A…

Read more →
January 26th, 2014

Ten Parenting Lessons
I Learned from Franz Kafka

Here's an adage which I think is true: every theory of parenting is implicitly a theory of society. It follows that even if you aren't a parent now, nor ever intend to be one, if you're interested in society and culture, you ought to be interested in the topic because the problems that we parents face (or believe we face) is…

Read more →