How would ethical philosophers redesign Soccer?

Published on Tuesday May 3rd, 2011

Aristotle: regardless of the final score, the team that practiced the hardest wins.

Bentham: each team’s players stand directly in front of the opposing goal, kicking in balls as fast as possible for 90 minutes. Add up both scores at the end.

Kant: a goal is worth zero points, and 1 point is subtracted for each rule violation.

Rand: 1 person on each team. Every game ends because they both immediately walk off the field when the other refuses to forfeit as an acknowledgement of their superiority before the game begins.

Lao Tzu: everyone just kick the ball around & don’t worry about getting it in the net - soccer is about the journey, not the destination.

Hobbes: the referee unifies both sides into a single team under his rule, forming an orderly bureaucracy to coordinate scoring of goals

Rawls: every game ends in a 0-0 draw because the players decide what the final score will be before they know what team they’re going to be on.

Levinas: the players simply gaze into each others eyes for 90 minutes in a profound encounter with radical alterity.

Lacan: each team fantasizes that they started the game down by one point, but they unconsciously sabotage their own team whenever they’re about to score

Habermas: the game is played inside a cafe, where teams try to persuade each other that their soccer strategy would be more successful


Readers of this post have also read

May 4th, 2011

A Functioning Cog In Some Great Machinery

I was raised up believin' I was somehow unique Like a snowflake, distinct among snowflakes Unique in each way you can see And now after some thinkin' I'd say I'd rather be A functioning cog in some great machinery Serving something beyond me. But I don't I don't know what that will be. I'll get back to you someday Soon you…

Read more →
February 25th, 2010

Caught in Play

An excerpt from Peter Stromberg's excellent book, Caught in Play: How Entertainment Works On You: I have before me as I write this an insert from my Sunday newspaper. On the cover of this insert, I am informed that it reaches 41.7 million readers each week.  The cover story is a compendium of advice, comprised of pointers from–among others—a natural healing…

Read more →
May 25th, 2011

Crowding out of intrinsic motivations

Luis Villa (lawyer, formerly the "geek-in-residence" of The Berkman Center For Internet and Society at Harvard) reviewed the psychological literature on the impact of paying people for work that they once did as volunteers to determine whether its a good idea for the GNOME Project to offer cash prizes ("bounties") for some code contributions instead of just relying on free labor:…

Read more →

Recent Popular Posts

February 13th, 2014

Left Activism Goes Corporate

One of the most tedious features of the Silicon Valley Hype Machine is its endless repetition of progressive sounding marketing slogans about democracy and freedom, all while promoting a pro-business agenda. But it's too easy to read this as a sinister corporate ploy to co-opt the language of activists and twisting…

Read more →
December 20th, 2013

Civility: A Distance That
Brings Us Together

Just in time for the holidays, Apple's marketing department released Misunderstood, an ad about a surly teenager absorbed in his iPhone in the midst of scenes of his family's idyllic Christmas togetherness. But he surprises everyone when he reveals that the whole time he was making a touching video for everyone to document their familial bliss, moving them to tears. A…

Read more →
January 26th, 2014

Ten Parenting Lessons
I Learned from Franz Kafka

Here's an adage which I think is true: every theory of parenting is implicitly a theory of society. It follows that even if you aren't a parent now, nor ever intend to be one, if you're interested in society and culture, you ought to be interested in the topic because the problems that we parents face (or believe we face) is…

Read more →