A BLOG of PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS & SPECULATIONS

This is the Totalitarian Procedure

Published on Thursday March 3rd, 2011

Mary Anne Rothenberg in The Excessive Subject: A New Theory of Social Change:

The premise (not the fact) that groups are formed by way of total emulation rather than contingent identifications serves the interest of repressive social groups such as the army. Why? Because the differences in identification (different unary traits) are occulted by the fantasy that the different members of the group lose their differences. That is, the members of the group are enjoined to become identical (the unifying-one), when in fact the mechanism of identification at work serves to particularize them (the countable-one): this gap is crucial to the ongoing function of repression. Because Symbolic identification constitutes the subject as particularized, the fantasy of group homogenization can never be realized, which means that the inevitable failure of every individual to perfectly match the ego ideal gives the disciplinary apparatus abundant and constant reasons to operate. The necessary fact of difference between individuals, and their unconscious diversity of choice of unary traits, gives the repressive authority ammunition for discipline and punishment for deviations from the fantasized sameness of the group members. In fact, to the extent that the authorities desire to hold on to their position, they will be at pains to seek out the most minor of differences for punishment, ensuring that efforts to do the impossible - perfectly emulate the standard of identification - continue and necessarily continue to fail, making the “need” for their intervention apparent. This is the totalitarian procedure in all its reliance on superegoic logic.

Colloqium

Readers of this post have also read

January 31st, 2011

Marx Against State Ownership

David Harvey in “The Future of the Commons,” Radical History Review Marx does not advocate state ownership but some form of ownership vested in the collective laborer producing for the common good. How that form of ownership might come into being is established by turning Locke’s argument on the production of value against itself. Suppose, says Marx, a capitalist begins production with…

Read more →
April 12th, 2011

The Dark Side of Humanist Management

Matthew Stewart in The Management Myth: Mayo’s work sheds light on the dark side of the “humanist” tradition in management theory. There is something undeniably creepy about a clipboard-bearing man hovering around a group of factory women, flicking the lights on and off and dishing out candy bars. All of that humanity—as anyone in my old firm could have told you—was…

Read more →
April 22nd, 2011

Neo-bohemia is Always Contaminated By Nostalgia

From Neo-bohemian Rhapsody Neo-bohemia is always contaminated by nostalgia, by the belief that the scene is over, and has been over since the yuppies moved in, the old bookstore closed, the Starbucks opened and so on. Lloyd writes that bohemia dies a thousand deaths and is always reborn, and that "bohemia is always already over because it always already falls short…

Read more →

Recent Popular Posts

February 13th, 2014

Left Activism Goes Corporate

One of the most tedious features of the Silicon Valley Hype Machine is its endless repetition of progressive sounding marketing slogans about democracy and freedom, all while promoting a pro-business agenda. But it's too easy to read this as a sinister corporate ploy to co-opt the language of activists and twisting…

Read more →
December 20th, 2013

Civility: A Distance That
Brings Us Together

Just in time for the holidays, Apple's marketing department released Misunderstood, an ad about a surly teenager absorbed in his iPhone in the midst of scenes of his family's idyllic Christmas togetherness. But he surprises everyone when he reveals that the whole time he was making a touching video for everyone to document their familial bliss, moving them to tears. A…

Read more →
January 26th, 2014

Ten Parenting Lessons
I Learned from Franz Kafka

Here's an adage which I think is true: every theory of parenting is implicitly a theory of society. It follows that even if you aren't a parent now, nor ever intend to be one, if you're interested in society and culture, you ought to be interested in the topic because the problems that we parents face (or believe we face) is…

Read more →